Poppy Fields



How I Research

How I research:

1. Look up interesting keywords on MLA Bibliography

2. Download whatever PDF full-text articles I can find.

3. Submit a flurry of ILL requests for what isn’t available full-text.

4. When those come, download them to the same folder as the others.

5. Never read more than about a page of any of it.

While electronic resources have made it easier to acquire articles, I feel it may have stopped there, for me at least. Confronted with the idea of reading the whole thing online, I simply skim a little bit and then save it for later, never to return. I could print it out, but most articles are 20-30 pages long, which is a lot of paper and ink, and now that I don’t officially belong to any department, I can’t use their printers and ink. Instead I just collect and collect but never read.

I was always one of the few grad students I knew who preferred writing to research anyway; I always wished I had the problem some of my colleagues complained about, feeling that they could never start writing because they hadn’t read everything yet. I love to read, but only novels; I never truly learned to love reading scholarship. I always jumped into the writing before I was ready. This is still my problem. And I am quick to blame technology for what is probably just a personal flaw. (Though perhaps I can at least claim that technology has exacerbated it — what do you think?)


Comments

  1. jelizabeth says:

    What if you used technology to make scholarship reading more fun? Like, you could upload the PDFs of the articles into Google Docs, and then highlight and annotate them.

    | Reply Posted 4 months, 1 week ago
  2. drpoppy says:

    Oh… that’s a good idea. I have never used (or, dare I admit, heard of) google docs — I’ll have to try it!

    | Reply Posted 4 months, 1 week ago
  3. jelizabeth says:

    Or… what about this? Scrivener: http://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.html I haven’t used it yet, but recently watched video tutorial for first time, and it looks fun and intuitive and useful. Maybe finding a fun technology would make some of the tedium of a big research project disappear…

    | Reply Posted 4 months, 1 week ago
    • drpoppy says:

      I’ll look at that one tomorrow… (love the name of it)… because Google docs doesn’t work for me — unless I’m missing something (which is very possible), it only lets you highlight/comment on Word docs, not PDFs (which is what I need).

      | Reply Posted 4 months, 1 week ago
  4. Anne says:

    Man–I’m having reverse envy to your envy, being at a point right now where I *still* feel like I can’t start writing yet, and I know that I just must have read enough. It’s at the point where I feel like I need to do research to write in my journal.

    But…let me know how the Scrivener program works out. Although I still have access to the department copier, my similarly haphazard research style has left me feeling like a really, really bad environmentalist. Not sure if I could go the distance with online reading (see your earlier post about the counter-intuitive nature of Kindle), but I’d like to at least try. You know, for the Earth.

    | Reply Posted 4 months ago


Leave a Comment

(required)

(required)



Formatting your comment
Back to Top | Textarea: Larger | Smaller